Oh to be a Freedman

2008-08-18T05:52:00.001-07:00

The Role of the Jews in WWI and WWII

2008-08-09T17:50:00.000-07:00

Benjamin H. Freedman, Germany and the Jews: The Role of the Jews in WWI and WWII

To see Dialogue

Click to go to page

PART 1

PART 2

PART 3

PART 4

To Go to My 360 page by click HERE

LEARNING AND EXPERIENCING IS OUR PURPOSE ON EARTH

2008-08-09T17:41:00.000-07:00

One question: one answer
LEARNING AND EXPERIENCING IS OUR PURPOSE ON EARTH

A Jewish Defector Warns America!
Benjamin Freedman Speaks On Zionism
1961 , Speech At Willard Hotel, Washington

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copied from a document Converted into PDF by Freedom Unlimited

This should do it! For the second and last time we are updating the transcript of Ben Freedman's 1961
speech at the Willard Hotel.
The piece has been posted for over a year now. A few months ago, a person challenged the authenticity of the
transcript, because his version stated that Samuel Untermeyer had used the Columbia Broadcasting studios
when he declared a worldwide boycott against Germany -- in his words: 'A Holy War'. We could not debate
the issue, having never heard the actual recording of Mr. Freedman's speech. Today, I discovered that we have
a cassette tape of the speech, so I listened to the entire tape while reading the posted transcript. According to
Mr. Freedman the radio station used by Untermeyer was, in fact, ABC.
There had also been some simple rearrangements of sentence structure in that transcript, and a line or two
omitted in places. For the sake of authenticity, the corrections have been made. The transcript is now word for
word from Mr. Freedman's speech.
The original transcriber had 'tidied up' Mr. Freedman's responses during the Q&A period, omitting superfluous
and repetitious words. For the most part, we've left the tidied up version as it was, since it didn't change the
response, and actually helped to clarify Mr. Freedman's answers. If the names were changed, he could have
been making that speech yesterday.
-- Jackie , April 8, 2003
Here is our first update notice, about a year ago:
The original posting of this speech was taken from an existing web site. In going through our files we recently
discovered a full transcript of the speech and realized the original posting was not complete. Here is the
transcript from our files, with additional text at the beginning - some within the body of the speech - and a
question and answer section at the end that had not been included in the original posting. There will be further
postings from other writers and quotes that will confirm much of what Mr. Freedman said here. Many of you
will see the truth of it, as it stands.
-- Jackie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Truth will stand on its own merit
A Jewish Defector Warns America: Benjamin Freedman Speaks
by Benjamin H. Freedman
Introductory Note
Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century.
Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the
principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the JudeoCommunist
victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at
least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny, which has enveloped the United States.
Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish
organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally
acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph
Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.
This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf
of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this
wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his
warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before.
-- K.A.S.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF THE HOLOCAUST
Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This speech is an explanation of the
plans now being laid to throw the United States into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a
large group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. Both the speech and the
question and answer period later so electrified the audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two
long-playing records which you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community.
The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a
former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and
stands today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker's platform to present Benjamin
Freedman.
(Applause)
[Freedman's speech]
What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able to learn from any other source,
and what I tell you now concerns not only you, but your children and the survival of this country and
Christianity. I'm not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I'm here to tell you
things that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the
freedom, and the right to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the
things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians.
Now, first of all, I'd like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 -- that was shortly before elections -- Senator
Kennedy, who is now the President of the United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the
Zionist Organization of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form, he stated that he would use
the armed forces of the United States to preserve the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists
who are now in occupation of that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes, away from their families, and sent
abroad to fight in Palestine against the Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes.
And these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people who
only want to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon
the Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent
the return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists
who were transplanted there from Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United States will trigger World
War III.
You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty between France and Algeria has
been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon
as France and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem world, has no more war
on their hands with France, they are going to move these people back into their homes, and when they do that
and President kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to what they stole from
innocent men, women and children, we will trigger World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we
cannot emerge from that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one nation in the
world that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a cause.
I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United Nations -- and of the ninety-nine nations
there, I've consulted with maybe seventy of them -- and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves
retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we're not going to have a man there to
fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days after President Kennedy -- or he
was then Senator Kennedy -- made that statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in
Lebanon and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of Palestine, which has been
dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists.
Not only that... they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are now drilling maybe a half a
million soldiers in that area of the world to lead these people back to their homeland. With them, they have as
their allies all the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes the Soviet Union
and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it includes every independent country in Asia and
Africa; or eighty percent of the world's total population. Eighty percent of the world's population. Four out of
five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us. And not alone are they four out
of five human beings now on the face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and
they are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and that's what we face.
And what is the reason? The reason is that here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have
complete control of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this --
time I'll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement -- the Zionists and their co-religionists
rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement to make', but let me show what happened while you were -- I
don't want to wear that out --- let me show what happened while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with
you. We were all asleep. What happened?
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World
War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one
side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
What happened?
Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German
submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great
Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her --
and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of
Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home,
they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the
border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a
negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let
everything be as it was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either
accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe,
went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the
documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at
all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said:
“Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the
negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will
come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were
powerful. They [Zionists] told England:
“We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your
side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
In other words, they made this deal:
“We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine
after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise
Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any
connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine -- should offer it as coin of the realm to
pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.
However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly
after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-
German -- totally pro-German -- because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews,
all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German
because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the
Czar.
The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers -- the
German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or
England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said:
“As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!”
But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist
regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England
and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to
green.
Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that
Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans
were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting
off babies' hands. And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis:
“Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work,
and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war."
And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no
more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our
war. We went in there -- we were railroaded into it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the
United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what
happened?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said:
“Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that
you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.”
Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work
out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world
at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as
a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so
much about, is just as phony as a three-dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war. The United States crushed
Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the
Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these
nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine for us?”
And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the
Germans, for the first time realized,
“Oh, that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war.”
And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that
was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally
resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had
been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard
Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German
Lloyd's and the Hamburg - American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the
Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in
the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt:
“Well, that was quite a sellout.”
It was a sellout that I can best compare -- suppose the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union.
And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget
the whole thing.”And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And
throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which
man's imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens,
who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union
and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, in the
United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There
wouldn't be lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when
the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to
Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany
down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now, Nahum Sokolow -- all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism
today -- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23, they wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their
statements -- that
"The feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great
defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against
them."
The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood
tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was
anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema' Yisrael” or
“Our Father.” No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that
developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their
crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was started against Germany for no
reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being
successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the
German Reich consisted of 300 -- three hundred! -- small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.
Three hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between the period of. . . between
Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time they
became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing
business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better products. And what happened?
What happened as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that:
"We must slap down Germany"
Because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to
wipe Germany off the map politically. Now, what happened after that?
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But
not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair.
Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department,
wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who
Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners. And he wrote
back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of
them were Jews, because the Jews happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that
time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others who had
international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that
they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. So they did take appropriate action against
them [against the Jews]. They... shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned
them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had
sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews
from every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany:
“You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a
Communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world,
are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.”
Well, the Germans told them... you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to people here... (You want to ask a
question? --- Uh, there were no Communists in Germany at that time. They were called 'Social Democrats.)
Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English words, and what they were called
in Germany is not very material... but they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over
Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took
over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he
thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet
the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for safety and for security.
Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet, the Jews were working,
still trying to get back into their former -- their status -- and the Germans fought them in every way they could,
without hurting a hair on anyone's head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists, fought the people who
were interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with pistols, they did it every way they could.
Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90
million Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews... less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews.
And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had come in
and with cheap money -- you know the way the Mark was devalued -- they bought up practically
everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in
Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came back to the United States -- who was the head of the
American delegation and the president of the whole conference -- and he went from the steamer to ABC and
made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a
sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are
going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are
dependent upon their export business."
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported
with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of
Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the
population.
Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page -- a whole page -- in the New York Times
on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that:
“This economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use
in the NRA”.
[National Recovery Administration] -- which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be
boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which of course was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you
couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of
crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked
"made in Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and like -- something
like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.
R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews... a woman found
stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings.
They may have been there 20 years, because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty years, I
haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people
walking around with signs saying "MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth.
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany.
There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was
nothing.
Now, that. . . naturally, the Germans said,
"Why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work,
and our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?"
They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.
Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott who was going to
starve Germany into surrender into the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or
chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the
German embassy in Paris and shot one of the officials [a German official] that the Germans really
started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having
street fights and so forth.
Now, for anyone to say that -- I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism' because it's meaningless, but it
means something to you still, so I'll have to use it -- the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany
against Jews was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this worldwide
boycott, and number three -- did I say for World War One, they were responsible? For the boycott -- and
also for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and
Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided [that] Europe is going to
be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist.
And the Germans decided: "We're going to keep it Christian if possible". And they started to re-arm.
And there intention was -- by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in
November, 1933 -- the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is
going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today,
"Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong."
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for defense, they say. Defense against
whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious
ways, took over control of many other governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is
something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A
megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our
nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first
developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200
megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished.
And why will it take place? It will take place because Act III... the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was
World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to
again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world
government. Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here
have read it, and it's known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that
war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a
deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a
person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other 's knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty
good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when
President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.
I was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was
liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the
head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income
tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand, and President
Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.
And that's how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.
Now, at this moment... at this moment they may be planning this World War III, in which we don't stand
a chance even if they don't use nuclear bombs. How can the United States -- about five percent of the world --
go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground? How can we do it... send our boys
over there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their 'commonwealth'?
They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says,
"Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony."
That is correct. I don't know from what state you come, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses
a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his testimony.
Now, what are the facts about the Jews?
The Jews -- I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to them
as so-called Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a Jew in the world today,
and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.
Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of
those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics
drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe -- and to reduce this so you don't get too confused about the history
of Eastern Europe -- they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia,
there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into the details of that now. It was
their religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.
Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a socalled
monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam -- the Moslem faith -- or what is known today as
Judaism -- really Talmudism.
So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that
became the state religion.
He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis with
their teachings, and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people -- 800,000 thousand
square miles -- and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There wasn't
one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but
back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support
their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:
"Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their Promised Land, their
ancestral homeland, It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and
Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish [were converted]. And it's just as
ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be... there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty
four million! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam
as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed
was born... imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine! Why, you'd say they're
lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt
as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish
became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of
inhabitants that were Christians. They weren't different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns... they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of
Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith -- Talmudic faith -- they had no
choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to
get out of Spain. So everybody -- they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being
belonged to the land under their feudal system -- so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians... for the great Christian countries of the world to say,
"We're going to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God's chosen people to their ancestral
homeland, their Promised Land."
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing
business, they have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the
same language ... so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call
black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies ... that is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Because
after two wars fought in Europe -- World War I and World War II -- if it wasn't possible for them to live in
peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living in the United States, what were the
two wars fought for? Did they have to -- like you flush the toilet -- because they couldn't get along, did
they have to say, "Well, we're going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us"?
I can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every
history teacher, knew the things that I'm telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money,
stuffed their mouths with money, and now... I don't care whether you know all this or not. It doesn't make any
difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my
family, boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and fight and die... like they died
in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've died all over the world. For what?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that
land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must
go to war? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State -- the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral
vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . .
the balance of power?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists.
And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr.
Kennedy. I think he's a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him.
And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows. He's playing with the
enemy. Like when you go fishing, you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. Let 'em out and
pull 'em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject, and how
close Kennedy is to his father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian , every person that regards the defense
of this country as a sacred right, that they communicate -- not with their congressman, not with their senator,
but with President Kennedy. And tell him,
"I do not think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of
America, and under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help
keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen".
I think everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I have just asked you to do. But I don't
think it's necessary to do that. You're above the average group in intelligence and I don't think it's necessary to
impress this any more.
But... I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about...
"Oh, the Jews. Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the
Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion".
But do you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day... and I was
one of them! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand --
and it's the only prayer for which you stand -- and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In
that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make
during the next twelve months -- any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months
shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no
force and effect, and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches:
"Don't forget -- whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge -- remember the Kol Nidre prayer
that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that".
How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans
depended upon it in 1916.
And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. You can't depend upon
something as insecure as the leadership that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go
on and recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your time, and you want to really,
uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow's going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me. . . well, you think to yourself: "well how did this fellow get mixed
up in this the way he got mixed up in it." Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in
newspapers and tried to tell the American people what I'm telling you. And one newspaper after another
refused the advertisement. And when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them -- I paid cash, not credit --
what happened? My lawyer told me, "There's an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take your
announcement". So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and that's how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he
said: "Well, I think he's a little anti-Semitic. I don't know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him
over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without any reservations. And I say it without
any hesitation... if it wasn't for the work that Mr. Conley McGinley did with "Common Sense" -- he's been
sending out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year -- if it wasn't for the work he's been doing sending those
out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light
fires. Many of the other active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through "Common
Sense".
Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I'm not as flush as I was. I cannot go on spending the
money... I'm not going to take up a collection. Don't worry. I see five people getting up to leave.
(Laughter)
I haven't got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a million of them out of my own pocket
and send them out. Mr. McGinley, when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally.
So I said, "With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good job". So I started printing in
outside shops of big newspaper companies, a quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there's always a
bottom to the barrel. I suppose we've all reached that at times.
I'm not so poor that I can't live without working and that's what worries the Anti-Defamation League. I can
just get by without going and asking for a job or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He's
sick and he's going at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want to close up "Common
Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making
to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: "Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy
backer of 'Common Sense'." The reason they do that is to discourage the people in the United States: don't
send any money to Common Sense. They don't need it. The've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That
all has strategy. They don't want to advertise me so that people that have real estate or securities to sell will
come and call on me. They just want people to lay off "Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is, I do try to
help him, but I haven't been able to. And I will be very honest. One thing I won't do is lie. In the last year I've
had so much sickness in my family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God alone knows. And he must be in God's care because how he's
pulled through his sickness and with his financial troubles, I don't know. But that press is working... and every
two weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go out with a new message.
And if that information could be multiplied ... if people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty,
give them around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don't know which will take root, but for God's sake,
this is our last chance.
[Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff', play
golf, etc., and use the money to keep "Common Sense" going. He explains that the paper is going in debt;
could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt
to bring the information to the American public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the
audience.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I'll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all have a very high degree of
intelligence, so I'm going to make an attempt. In the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area known
as Judea. Judea was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a
Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for
a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as 'j', and the first syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'.
Now, when the Bible was written, it was first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those
languages. Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn't exist. Judea was the country,
and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only as a Judean. I've seen those early... the earliest
scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English.
There was no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church
people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe
translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long
ago forgotten that. So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew". At
the time, there was no printing press.
Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that word passed through so many
changes... I have them all here. If you want I can read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the
Wycliffe Bible became. . . first it was ' gyu ', then ' giu ', then ' iu ' (because the ' i ' in Latin is pronounced like
the ' j '. Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j' in Latin) then ' iuw ', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then '
iwe ', then ' iow ', then ' iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then ' ieue ', then ' iue ', then ' ive ', and then '
ivw ', and finally in the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew.
All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no such thing as 'Jew',
and any theologian -- I've lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country,
and two in Europe -- there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a Judean and
the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was 'gyu' -- Jew. A contracted and
shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to short
up. So, in England there were no public schools; people didn't know how to read; it looked like a scrambled
alphabet so they made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews, is just
ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says that. I'd like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the United States, do
to people who did to you what the so-called Jews -- the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers -- they weren't
Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism.
There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in
Bible history as Torah [inaudible]. No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They
pulled it out of the air... a meaningless word.
Just like 'anti-Semitic'. The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about people who don't like Jews as
anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There
isn't one Jew who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european Jews. So, they
brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this reverend who told you these things, I'll
convince him and it'll be one step in the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is wrong. Your first premise that all the
Jews are loyal to each other is wrong. Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many
that they create the impression that they are the Jewish 'race'; that they are the Jewish nation; that they are the
Jewish people... and the Christians swallow it like a cream puff.
But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over the world for the purpose of
abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that
conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said,
"What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre? That gives us our grip on our people. We give
them a franchise so they can tell the Christians, 'Go to hell. We'll make any deal you want', but
they don't have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people".
So, they're not so united, and if you knew the feeling that exists. . .
Now, I'll also show you from an official document by the man responsible for... uh, who baptized this race.
Here is a paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization in New York City, and in it is
the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who -- on behalf of the British Cabinet -- negotiated the deal with
these Zionists.
And in here he says that all the jews in England were against it. The Jews who had been there for years, the
[inaudible - probably Sephardim], those who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry... who were
monotheists and believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European Jews were still running
around in the heart of Asia and then came into Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we
talk about a Christian 'race'? or a Christian religion?... or are the Christians united?
So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I'll show you in this same document that when they went to
France to try and get the French government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France
who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal
------------------------------------------------
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: You know why? Because if they don't, they're decked up. They come around and they tell you
how much you must give, and if you don't ... oh, you're anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends will have
anything to do with them, and they start a smear campaign... and you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in the building. And when the drive is
on to sell Israel Bonds, the United Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and
opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a gold star after the name. Then, the
buyers are told, "When you come into that building to call on someone and they haven't got a gold star, tell
them that you won't buy from them until they have the gold star". BLACKMAIL. I don't know what else you
can call it.
Then what do they do? They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes' and they send maybe $8 billion
dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if they hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven
billion of it would have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens? That seven billion
dollars deficit -- that air pocket -- the gullible Christians have to make up.
They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to pay the housekeeping expenses for
the government. So why do you let these people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of
their ancient homeland? And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no place to go and they've
been persecuted all their lives". They've never been persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two
rows of Rabbis here to challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for their
religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the First in 1285 drove them out, and
they never came back until the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For fourhundred
years there wasn't a Jew.
But do you know why they were driven out? Because in the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it's a sin to
charge 'rent' for the use of money. In other words - what we call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest, and when the Lords and Dukes
couldn't pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally
made himself their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of these dukes bumped off the
Jews... the money-lenders. So the king finally said -- and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or
Rourke, the History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your library. When the king found out
what the trouble was all about, and how much money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent
partner of the money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the revenues of the British
Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes kept killing the money-lenders, the
King then said, "I declare myself the heir of all the money-lenders. If they're killed you have to pay me,
because I'm his sole heir". That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the money
with an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they
went across to Ireland, and that's how Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom.
When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland for himself before someone
else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time
where a Jew was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never happened. It's always
their impact on the political, social, or economic customs and traditions of the community in which they
settle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin
Franklin to say it. Most of those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by hearsay
understood, what was happening in Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom, and absorbed them, most
of the well-to-do Khazars fled to Western Europe and brought with them the very things to which you object
and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the instincts with which they were
endowed. When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that's the name that they went by, and
when the Christians first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia -- who they were -- that they
had practiced this Talmudic faith -- the Christians in Western Europe said,
"They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!"
And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that -- and he's probably as good an authority on
that subject as there is. So when Ben Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of
what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every word of it is true... they say it
themselves. I can give you half a dozen books they've written in which they say the same thing: When they
have money they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they become ruthless. They're only
barbarians. They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did? The Czar had abdicated nine or ten months
before that. There was no need for them... they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn't
want that. When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they mowed them all down and
established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought, "Now is the time", and if you you will look in the Encyclopedia
Britannica under the word 'Bolshevism', you'll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful
revolution. One of them is, "Wait for the right time, and then give them everything you've got". It would pay
you to read that.
You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the Encyclopedia Britannica states that
the Jews conceived and created and cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the
spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew more about Communism than he. And
the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been printing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: Well, I can't advocate that you do anything that's criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start
what I call an endless chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement: Mr.
Kennedy's office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his office -- was in
his office -- and gave me this. He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:
"For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th".
"Israel is here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the Democratic Party.
The White House must take the lead. American intervention. We will act promptly and
decisively against any nation in the Middle East, which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we
make clear to both Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force
and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation".
Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr. Kennedy
going to do that? Suppose three million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the
deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed -- the Texans were
disarmed -- and one night they drove them all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the
Alamo. What would the United States say? Would we say it's aggression for these Texans to try to get their
homes back from the Mexican thieves?
Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all
the whites into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida... drove them out completely, and declared
themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these
people, the whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, "No, those Negroes now occupy them! Leave
them there!", or "No, those Mexicans are in Texas. They declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them
there. You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else".
Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to go back to their homes? So now,
you've got to write to President Kennedy and say,
"We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the word, if these people want to
return to their homes as the United Nations -- fifteen times in the last twelve years -- called upon
the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former
homes and farms".
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on
behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]

THE HIDDEN TYRANNY

2008-08-09T17:36:00.000-07:00

THE HIDDEN TYRANNY

The Issue that Dwarfs All Other Issues

By Benjamin Freedman, Jewish Conspirator Emeritus
Seven U.S. Presidents -- Masters of Deception -- Jewish Pawns
The names of Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S.
Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F.Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and
Richard M. Nixon will certainly be found one day inscribed in big red
letters in the official annals of the rise and fall of the United states.
These seven masters of deception incurred their guilt by debasing their
solemn oaths of office on behalf of undisclosed domestic and foreign
principals without any apparent qualms or misgivings, to enhance their
political fortunes totally oblivious of the threat to United States
security and survival.
These seven masters of deception knowingly and willingly in effect and in
fact "poisoned the wells" of security and survival for the United States.
Without any evident scruples, they individually betrayed the sacred
traditions enshrined in the letter and spirit of their oaths of office,
that precious heritage bequeathed to each of these seven masters of
deception as successors to that high office exalted by the immortalized
first president of the United States, the venerated George Washington.
The disclosures which follow here are now revealed for the first time
anywhere. They now expose for the first time to the grass roots
population of the United States the secret un-American, non- American and
anti-American strategy to which these seven masters of deception
knowingly subscribed. The uninhibited practice of that strategy by these
seven masters of deception is primarily responsible for desperate
predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle
East.
Very early in their political careers, these seven masters of deception
by their determination acquired their proficient skill in detecting on
which side their political bread was buttered. Their remarkable
perfection in that skill provides the answer to why these seven masters
of deception went so far and so fast in so few years in the political
world in which they moved.
Throughout their political careers these seven masters of deception
demonstrated that political shrewdness invariably identified with the
immoral dogma of 20th century politicians who preach and practice "any
means justifies all ends." Accordingly, future grass roots populations of
the United States will one day find inscribed in the history of the rise
and fall of the United States the verdict that the "means" today
advocated by these seven masters of deception were primarily responsible
for the "end" of the United States.
It is today a well recognized fact of life in political circles in the
United States that the censorship exercised today by Zionists over the
media for mass information constitutes a virtual monopoly. It is likewise
today a well recognized fact of life in political circles in the United
States since President Wilson won his first election in 1912 as president
of the United States, that elections in the United States are seldom won
or lost today based upon the candidates' qualification for office.
Elections in the United States since 1912 are won or lost on the
battlefields of the media for mass information by character
assassination. Zionist ownership of media for mass information, or by
Zionist control exercised by some devious corporate device in effect and
in fact censors the news and editorial policies of as the leading daily
and Sunday newspapers, all the weekly and monthly news magazines, all
leading radio and television stations and networks, the entire motion
picture industry, the entire entertainment world and the entire book
publishing industry, in effect and in fact the entire complex of media
for mass information in the United States, truly a brainwashing monopoly.
Talmudist Jews Control News and editorial Policies of Mass Media
As a result of that condition in the United States, for approximately the
past fifty years the grass root population of the United States has only
read, heard and seen what passed Zionist censorship and best served
Zionist objectives, instead of reading, hearing and seeing what best
served the interests of the grass roots population of the United States.
The Zionist-ruled media for mass information in the United States never
informed the grass roots population of the United States how and why
President Woodrow Wilson lied the United States into the desperate
predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle
East. In their consideration recently of the alleged theft of the socalled
Pentagon Papers, the United States Supreme Court declared "the
public has a right to know the truth." The Supreme Court should have said
"the public has a right to know the WHOLE truth."
The reason half-truths often are more harmful than lies. The United
States declared war against Germany on April 6, 1917. On April 2,1917
President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress and pleaded with them
to declare war against Germany. President Wilson's appeal to Congress to
declare war against Germany in effect and in fact was primarily President
Wilson's liquidation of his obligation to his blackmailers.
The following incontestible facts confirm that conclusion beyond all
question of any doubt. President Wilson's hand trembled as he read his
address. The members of Congress present had no reason to suspect why
President Wilson's hand trembled. By the time the grass roots population
finish reading this, they will know the reason President Wilson's hand
trembled as he read his message to Congress.
By the time President Wilson finished reading his appeal to Congress,
many of his listeners were in tears but not for the reason the grass
roots population of the United States today will be in tears when they
finish reading this manuscript. When President Wilson asked Congress to
declare war against Germany, President Wilson was in effect and in fact
conspiring to pay the debt he obligated himself to pay to the Zionists.
Congress only declared war against Germany because President Wilson
informed Congress that a German submarine had sunk the S.S. Sussex in the
English Channel in violation of international law and that United States
citizens aboard the S.S. Sussex had perished with the ship. After General
Pershing's troops were fighting in Europe, the hoax was exposed.
The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was used as the "pretext" to
justify a declaration of war against Germany by the United States. The
S.S. Sussex had not been sunk and no United States citizens had lost
their lives. The United States was now at war in Europe as Great
Britain's ally. That is what Great Britain and the Talmudists ("Jews") of
the world conspired to achieve in their crooked diplomatic underworld.
The discovery of the hoax by the British Navy shocked many honorable
Englishmen. A large segment of the British public were shocked to learn
the S.S. Sussex had not been sunk. The S.S. Sussex was available for
anyone to visit who might care to do so to see the S.S. Sussex for
themselves with their own eyes. In that war the United States mobilized
4,734,991 men to serve in the armed forces, of whom 115,516 were killed
and 202,002 were either injured or maimed for life.
The Right Honorable Francis Neilson, a member of Parliament, wrote a book
in England called Makers of War (pp. 149150). Mr. Neilson's book created
such a sensation that Mr. Neilson was compelled to resign his seat in
Parliament. Things became so intolerable for Mr. Neilson in Great Britain
as a Result of the exposures in his book that he was compelled for his
personal safety to flee from his home in Great Britain and to make his
home in the United States.
In Mr. Neilson's book Makers of War (pp. 149-150), he discloses many
unsuspected and undisclosed reasons for the outbreak of World War I in
Europe in August 1914. With reference to the alleged sinking of the S.S.
Sussex in the English Channel, Mr. Neilson emphasizes: "/n America,
Woodrow Wilson, desperate to find a pretext to enter the war, found it at
last in the 'sinking' of the Sussex in mid-channel.
Someone invented a yarn that American lives had been lost. With thus
excuse he went to Congress for a declaration of war. Afterwards, the Navy
found that the Sussex had not been sunk, and that no lives had been lost.
" This author crossed the English Channel many times on the S.S. Sussex.
The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was the figment of an over-worked
Zionist imagination. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was conceived
in the imagination of a Zionist to facilitate the purpose planned and
successfully executed.
President Wilson Blackmailed
Shortly after President Wilson's first inauguration, he received a
visitor in the White House by the name of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer. Mr.
Untermeyer was a prominent New York City attorney who contributed
generously to the National Democratic Committee that installed President
Wilson in the White House in Washington in the 1912 election.
Mr. Untermeyer was a very welcome guest and President Wilson was very
glad to welcome him to the White House. They had met before during the
campaign. Mr. Untermeyer surprised President Wilson when he finally
stated what brought hum to the White House. Mr. Untermeyer informed
President Wilson that he had been retained to bring a breach of promise
action against President Wilson.
Mr. Untermeyer informed President Wilson that his client was willing to
accept $40,000.00 in lieu of commencing the breach of promise action. Mr.
Untermeyer's client was the former wife of a Professor at Princeton
University at the same time President Wilson was a professor at Princeton
University.
Mr. Untermeyer produced a packet of letters from his pocket, written by
President Wilson to his colleague's wife when they were neighbors at
Princeton University. These letters established the illicit relationship
which had existed between President Wilson and the wife of his colleague
neighbor.
He had written many endearing letters to her, many of which she never
destroyed. President Wilson acknowledged his authorship of the letters
after examining a few of them. President Wilson left Princeton University
to become the Governor of New Jersey, In 1912 he was elected to his first
term as president of the United States. In the interim, President
Wilson's former sweetheart had divorced her husband and married again.
Her second husband resident in Washington with a grown son who was in the
employ of one of the leading banks in Washington. Mr. Untermeyer
explained to President Wilson that his former sweetheart was very fond of
her husband's son. He explained that this son was in financial trouble
and suddenly needed $40,000.00, as he told the story, to liquidate a
pressing liability to the bank for which he worked.
The details are not relevant here except that the son needed the
$40,000.00 badly and quickly. President Wilson's former sweetheart
thought that Wilson was the logical prospect for that $40,000,00 to help
her husband's son. Mr. Untermeyer visited President Wilson at the White
House to break the news to him about the breach of promise action being
considered.
Wilson expressed himself as very fortunate that his former sweetheart
went to Mr. Untermeyer to seek his assistance. The publicity could have
proven very embarrassing to President Wilson if his former sweetheart had
instead consulted a Republican attorney.
President Wilson quickly set Mr. Untermeyer's mind at rest by informing
him that he did not have $40.000.00 available for any purpose. Mr.
Untermeyer suggested that President Wilson should think the matter over
and said he would return in a few days to discuss the matter further.
Mr. Untermeyer used the next few days in Washington looking into the
credibility of the son's story about his pressing need for $40,000.00 to
liquidate a pressing liability. He learned that the son's story was not
misrepresented in any way to his mother by her son.
Mr. Untermeyer returned to President Wilson a few days later as they had
agreed. President Wilson did not hesitate to inform Mr. Untermeyer that
he did not have the $40,000.00 to pay his blackmailer. President Wilson
appeared irritated. Mr. Untermeyer considered the matter a few Moments
and then volunteered a solution to President Wilson for his problem.
Mr, Untermeyer volunteered to give President Wilson's former sweetheart
the $40,000.00 out of his own pocket on one condition: that Wilson
promise Untermeyer to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States
Supreme Court a nominee to be recommended to Wilson by Untermeyer.
Without further talk, President Wilson accepted Mr. Untermeyer's generous
offer and Mr. Untermeyer promptly paid the $40,000.00 in currency to
President Wilson 's former sweetheart. The contemplated breach of promise
suit was never heard of after that.
Mr. Untermeyer retained in his possession permanently the packet of
letters to insure against any similar attempt at some future time.
President Wilson was most grateful to Mr. Untermeyer for everything he
was doing to solve problem. Mr. Untermeyer was a man of great wealth.
The law firm in New York of which he was the leading partner, Messrs.
Guggenheim, Untermeyer and Marshall, is still today one of the nations
most prominent and most prosperous law firms. Mr. Untermeyer organized
the Bethlehalem Steel Company for his friend, Mr. Charles M. Schwab, who
resigned from the United States Steel Company to form his company in
competition with it.
Justice Brandeis--The Pay Off
As anyone might reasonable suspect, Mr. Untermeyer must have had
something in mind when he agreed to pay President Wilson's former
sweetheart $40,000.00 out of his own pocket.
He paid the money out of his own pocket in the hope that it might bring
to pass a dream close to his heart--a Talmudist ("Jew") on the United
States Supreme Court on which none had ever served. The day soon arrived
when President Wilson was presented with the necessity of appointing a
new member of the United States Supreme Court.
Mr. Untermeyer recommended Louis Dembitz Brandeis for the vacancy, who
was immediately appointed by Wilson. President Wilson and Justice
Brandeis became unusually intimate friends. Justice Brandeis knew the
circumstances of his appointment to the Supreme Court by President
Wilson. In l9l4 Justice Brandeis was the most prominent and most
politically influential of all Zionists in the United States.
As a Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Brandeis was in a better
position than ever before to be of service to Talmudists ("Jews") both at
home and abroad. The first opportunity to perform a great service for his
Zionist followers soon became available to Brandeis.
Justice Brandeis volunteered his opinion to President Wilson that the
sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel
with the loss of lives of United States citizens justified the
declaration of war against Germany by the United States.
Relying to a great extent upon the legal opinion of Justice Brandeis,
President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress on April 2, l9l7. He
appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany and they did on April
7, l9l7. After the October l9l6 agreement was concluded between the
British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, the Talmudists
throughout the world were hopeful that an international incident would
soon occur to Justify a declaration of war against Germany by the United
States.
The declaration of war against Germany by the United States guaranteed
the Talmudists throughout the world that Palestine was to be turned over
to them upon the defeat of Germany. The defeat of Germany was certain if
the United States could be railroaded into the war in Europe as Great
Britain's ally. Prior to the October 1916 London Agreement, Talmudists
throughout the world were pro-German.
The German Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Talmudists in Germany
all civil rights enjoyed by Germans. Every country in Europe had quotas
for Talmudists. The quota systems had existed for centuries in all
European countries. Under the quota system in European countries,
Talmudists were Limited in all activities to a small percentage of the
Christian population of the country.
The quota systems applied to all occupations. After the Emancipation
Edict In 1822, Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place
restrictions on Talmudists under a quota system limiting their civil
rights. Talmudists throughout the world were informed by cable from
London about the October 1916 London Agreement.
That information transformed them from pro-German to pro-British. Great
Britain placed at the disposal of Talmudists in London their secret codes
and worldwide cable facilities to inform Talmudists throughout the world
about Great Britain's pledge to turn over Palestine to them as
compensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe as
Great Britain s ally in their war against Germany. Talmudists enlisted in
great numbers in October 1916 in Great Britain's Department of Defense.
Their purpose was to facilitate transforming Talmudists throughout the
world from pro-German to pro-British. After the London Agreement was
concluded, Great Britain left no stone unturned to impress Talmudists in
London with the necessity of immediately notifymg Talmudists throughout
the world about Great Britain's pledge to turn over Palestine to them for
their future sovereign Zionist state.
Guided by the recommendation of Justice Brandeis that the sinking of the
S.S. Sussex justified a declaration of war under international law
against Germany by the United States, President Wilson addressed a joint
session of both houses of Congress on April 2, 1917.
In that address President Wilson pleaded with Congress to declare war
against Germany. Congress met on April 6. 1917. and declared war against
Germany without justification. On April 6, 1917, President Wilson and
Justice Brandeis knew something the grass roots population of the United
States did not know--they knew full particulars about the October 1916
London Agreement.
They also knew the declaration of war against Germany by the United
States activated this agreement and that Talmudists of the world would
not have to wait long for Palestine, their sovereign Zionist state, if
their plan worked. On this same day, Wilson and Brandeis knew something
else the grass roots population of the United States did not know--they
knew that the declaration of war by the United States against Germany
discharged President Wilson from his obligation to his blackmailers.
Wilson's declaration of war was to satisfy his commitment to his
blackmailers. There was seldom any address made to Congress that stirred
the people of the United States, and the world, as did President Wilson's
April 2, 1917, plea to Congress to declare war against Germany.
Wilson was aware when he addressed Congress that Germany had not
committed any act against the United States which justified a declaration
of war by the United States against Germany under international law. This
author at that time knew President Wilson was informed to that effect
before he made his plea to Congress.
Prime Minister Lloyd George - A Zionist Tool
There were great numbers of Talmudists in the United States who
questioned the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement. They found
it extremely difficult to believe that Great Britain would promise to
turn over Palestine to them as compensation for railroading the United
States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
These Talmudists could not believe that Great Britain would promise
anything to anyone that Great Britain did not own as compensation. That
appeared inconceivable to Talmudists familiar with Great Britain's
reputation for respect of property rights under their laws.
To overcome doubts that existed in the minds of Talmudists in the United
States, Prime Minister Lloyd George immediately sent Mr. Josiah Wedgewood
to the United States. Mr. Wedgewood was one of the most respected and
dedicated members of Parliament.
Prime Minister Lloyd George, a rabid well-known Zionist, was unexpectedly
appointed Prime Minister on December 4, 1916. He rushed Mr. Wedgewood to
the United States on December 5, 1916, under pressure by Talmudists in
London. The prime minister whom Lloyd George succeeded was unsympathetic
Toward Zionist objectives.
He was replaced at that time because Zionists could not rule him. Great
Britain was helpless in October 1916. It was seriously considering
surrender to Germany. Germany had made several peace offers to Great
Britain earlier to discontinue the war. Mr. Lloyd George considered Mr.
Wedgewood's hasty trip to the United States vital to Great Britain's
survival.
Mr. Wedgewood went to the United States with documented evidence proving
the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement with the Talmudists.
Colonel House - a Conspiring Enigma
Mr. Wedgewood arrived in the United States on December 23, 1916. Upon his
arrival he was met at the pier by Colonel Edward Mandel House, President
Wilson's closest personal friend and most trusted adviser.
Col. House in early life negotiated cotton purchases in the United States
for Rothschild interests in Great Britain. Col. House did not claim or
disclaim his Talmudist ancestry to this author. He had arranged with Mr.
Wedgewood to live in his apartment on 54th Street during his stay in the
United States.
Col. House quickly made arrangements for the meeting at which Mr.
Wedgewood was to prove the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement.
The meeting was to be held on Sunday afternoon, December 25, l916, at the
old Hotel Savoy at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue in New Yolk City.
There were fifty-one invited Talmudists present there when Col. House
introduced Mr. Wedgewood to the audience. Mr. Wedgewood then presided.
Mr. Wedgewood presented evidence there that left no doubt in the minds of
the fifty-one Talmudists present about the reality of the October 1916
London Agreement.
On behalf of Mr. Lloyd George, Mr. Wedgewood further vouched for the
reality of Great Britain pledge that Palestine would be turned over to
Talmudists of the world by Great Britain upon the defeat of Germany as
compensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe as
Great Britain's ally.
After concluding the October 1916 London Agreement, Talmudists in England
were invited by Great Britain to take an increasingly active
participation in Great Britain's Department of Defense for the duration
of the war. The Talmudists who accepted the invitation were trained as
experts in the use of Great Britain's codes and Great Britain's worldwide
diplomatic cable facilities.
The available data in Great Britain's archives for World War I will
dispel all existing doubt whether the information cabled to Washington
from London alleging the sinking of the S.S. Sussex and the loss of
United States lives was the invention of Talmudists in London in Great
Britain's Department of Defense to facilitate and expediate railroading
the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. The
hoax was discovered by the British Navy.
It was also confirmed by other equally reliable sources for information
on the subject by qualified united States experts. The reality of the
October l9l6 London Agreement was known to the Germans shortly after it
was concluded, in fact, on the same day. Germany thereafter exercised
great care both on land and on sea not to commit any act which, under
international law, could provide the United States with justification to
declare war against Germany.
German military and naval commanders leaned over backwards in their
effort not to provide the United States with that justification and they
were successful. In the crisis in October 1916, Germans had reason to
feel if the war in Europe continued a few more months without the
entrance of the United States into the war, that Great Britain would be
compelled to surrender to Germany by circumstances beyond Great Britain's
power to control.
Germany made another peace offer to Great Britain in October 1916. Great
Britain this time welcomed the offer but it was also declined like
several previous peace offers. In referring to the declaration of war
against Germany by the United States, Sir Winston Churchill said in an
interview with a prominent editor, published in Scribner's Commentator in
1936, that he "could never understand why he put us in in 1917,"
referring to President Wilson.
In that interview Sir Winston Churchill stated further: ''America should
have minded her own business and stayed out of the World War. If you
hadn't entered the war the Allies would have made peace with Germany in
the spring of 1917. Had we made peace there would have been no collapse
of Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in Italy followed by
Fascism, and Germany would not have signed the Versailles Treaty, which
has enthroned Nazism in Germany.
If America had stayed out of the war, all of these 'isms' wouldn't be
sweeping the continent of Europe and breaking down parliamentary
government, and if England made peace early in 1917, it would have saved
over one million British, French, American and other lives. Germany's
peace offer to Great Britain asked for neither indemnities nor
reparations.
Germany offered to restore the territorial status and the political
independence of every country with whom Great Britain was at war, as they
existed in August l9l4 when the war in Europe started. Germany demanded
no benefits.
Talmudist Jews Select America 's Ally for First World War
Germany's October 1916 peace offer was on the table before the British
War Cabinet; it needed only one signature to end the war. Great Britain
would have quickly accepted Germany's peace offer if the World Zionist
Organization had not Interfered.
The British War Cabinet was then taking their instructions from
Talmudists in London. When the British War Cabinet decided to accept
Germany's peace offer, the World Zionist Organization offered to railroad
the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally if Great
Britain promised the Talmudists of the world Palestine as compensation
after Germany's defeat with the United States as an ally.
Talmudist pressure in London and New York prevailed. President Wilson had
little choice in the matter, it seemed. He was the captive of
circumstances in his early life that could not be altered. His April 2,
1917, address to Congress was about to decide the fate of the world.
Congress, without hesitation, declared war against Germany for him. The
Germans attributed their crushing defeat in World War I to the entry of
the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
Germany considered the October 1916 London Agreement a stab in the back
by Talmudists of the world. In view of the Emancipation Edict in Germany
in 1822, Germans regarded the London Agreement as a double-cross by
Talmudists in Germany. Quota systems then existed in all other countries
in Europe. There was no quota system in Germany after the Emancipation
Edict of 1822 for Talmudists.
Talmudist Jews Promote Germans Victory, Then Stab them in the Back
The Kaiser provided the World Zionist Organization with the offices for
their world headquarters in Berlin. He, his family and government
officials were constantly extending assistance to Theodore Herzl. Germany
extended opportunities to Talmudists not available in other European
countries.
The Kaiser himself arranged the personal beeting between the Sultan of
the Ottoman Empire and Theodore Herzl. Bleichroeder & Company in Berlin
were the private bankers of the Kaiser's family for generations. They
were Talmudists. Warburg & Company of Hamburg were the world's largest
merchant bankers. They were Talmudists.
The head of the German General Electric Company, then the world's largest
industrial enterpnse, was a Talmudist. The head of the Hamburg- American
and North German Lloyd steamship companies, the two largest steamship
companies in the world, second only to the Cunard Line, was a Talmudist.
Countless prominent German industrialists, bankers and merchants were
Talmudists The attitude of Germans towards Talmudists in Germany and
throughout the world worsened much after the October 1916 stab in the
back by Talmudists.
Mr. Samuel Landman, the secretary of the World Zionist Organization in
London from 1917 to 1922, wrote in his Great Britain, the Jews and
Palestine, published in London in 1936, on page six: "The fact that it
was Jewish help that brought the U.S.A. into the war on the side of the
Allies has rankled ever since in German- - especially Nazi--minds and has
contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism
occupied in the Nazi programme."
The sentiments of prominent German leaders were expressed in the Jewish
Daily Bulletin of New York City on October 30, 1934, in an article
reprinted on page three from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency dispatch from
Berlin which stated: "The New Germany persists toward the complete
extermination of the Jew because it was Jews who instigated the United
States to enter the World War, accomplishing the defeat of Germany, and
who later caused the inflation in Germany, Herr Richard Kunze, a leading
Nazi Parliament figure, declared at a mass meeting in Magdeburg
yesterday."
Talmudists throughout the world made bad matters worse on August 7, 1933,
when they declared their "holy war" to destroy the German nation "by
destroying their export trade upon which their very existence depends."
Under the leadership of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, Talmudists of the world
declared a world boycott on all German goods and services.
They asked their "Christian friends" to join their worldwide boycott of
German goods and services. Mr. Samuel Untermeyer arranged for the
"International Boycott Conference" in Amsterdam in July 1933.
There he was elected the president of the "World Jewish Economic
Federation." Talmudists throughout the world had tried in vain since 1919
to silence German resentment against them for railroading the United
States into the war in Europe without justification or provocation by the
United States as Great Britain's ally. Talmudists were held responsible
for Germany's defeat and for every disadvantage that resulted from that
defeat.
The New York Times of August 7, 1933, published the Talmudists'
declaration of their "holy war" against Germany in a three-column report
of Mr. Untermeyer's address to the nation from the Columbia Broadcasting
Company's studio on the night of his arrival home from Europe.
Mr. Untermeyer, among other things, stated: "...holy war...in which we
are embarked..it is a war which must be waged unremittingly...the Jews
are the aristocrats of the world... the economic boycott against all
German goods, shipping and services...boycott is our only really
effective weapon...bring the German people to their senses by destroying
their export trade on which their very existence depends...we shall force
them to learn...it is not sufficient that you buy no goods in
Germany...you must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who
sells any German-made goods...we will drive the last nail in the
coffin... "
That statement was made on August 7, 1933, when not a hair on the head of
a Talmudist in Germany had been touched. Germany was plunged into a
depression difficult to describe in a few words, Germany's export
business suddenly ending as if by magic.
Talmudists hoped that way to stop Germans from continuing to talk about
why they lost the war. Talmudists in Germany were finding it difficult to
live that down. Germans then felt the way Sir Winston Churchill in 1936
expressed himself about the entry of the United States into World War I
in 1917.
Zionist Worldwide Boycott Against German Merchandise Creates Domestic
Crisis
The eminent Rabbi Maurice L. Perlman, head of the British Section of the
World Jewish Congress, stated to a Canadian audience as reported by The
Toronto Evening Telegram of February 26, 1940, that: "The World Jewish
Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years. "
Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon delivered an address on December 20, 1951,
as reported in The National Jewish Post of Indianapolis of December 28,
1951, in which he stated: "One of the major causes for our going to war
against Hitler was the persecution of the Jews in Germany. "
Dr. Donald C. Blaisdell, professor of government at the College of the
City of New York, published an important document entitled American
Policy for the near East in a publication called Issues published in New
York, the official organ of the American Council for Judaism, in the fall
issue in 1959, in which Dr. Blaisdell stated: "No minority of Irish. of
German, of Polish, Italian, or Greek extraction has been able to
manipulate policy to its advantage as have the Zionist leaders of
American Jews. Nor does there appear to be any politically feasible means
by which the American government can place the claims of its important
clientele in proper perspective. Like American Jews who are presumed to
be members of Israel 's American clientele are never allowed to forget
it, so the American government, Congress and Executive branch alike, is
never permitted to free itself from the pressure, propaganda and power
emanating from the same Zionist sources. "
This author has been in a position since 1912 to witness what was going
on behind the scenes. This author served on the National Democratic
Committee in the 1912 campaign that elected President Wilson to his first
term. No doors have been closed to this author since then.
This author was ushered into this world in 1890 by Dr. Simon Baruch, the
father of Mr. Bemard M. Baruch. Mr. Bemard Baruch was a good friend of
this author's family and would very often consult this author on this
situation.
Franklin Roosevelt Manipulated by Talmudic Jews
President Franklin D. Roosevelt was a captive of the Talmudists from the
time he went to Albany as govemor of the state of New York. President
Roosevelt was long beholden to the Talmudists.
The story of how President Roosevelt lied the United States into the
desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself in
the Middle East is not a long story.
It is the story of how President Roosevelt railroaded the United States
into the Second World War: Germany and Poland had agreed upon a formula
giving Germany access across the Danzig Corridor. President Wilson, in
1919, created the Danzig Corrjdor which separated Gemmany into two
halves.
In order to keep Germany weak, at the instigation of Talmudists at
theVersialles Peace Conference, President Wilson cut Germany into two
halves, separated by a strip of German territory granted to Poland which
divided Germany into two halves. Crossing the Danzig Corridor from
western Germany to eastern Germany or vice versa was like traveling from
one country to another.
The inconveniences, the delays and the annoyances to Germany and Poland
had finally worked out their acceptable arrangement that eliminated a
majority of German objections to the Danzig Corridor. Germany and Poland
reached a basis that would serve to prevent Germany's resort to more
aggressive action. Adolf Hitler was the head of the German government at
the time.
Talmudists throughout the world opposed the peaceful adjustment between
Germany and Poland of the Danzig Corridor situation. Unrestricted access
of traffic between the western half and the eastern half of Germany would
soon make Germany again the most powerful country in the world.
Talmudists throughout the world dreaded the thought. In spite of the
difficulties placed in the way of reaching a solution for the Danzig
Corridor problem, Germany and Poland finally agreed upon a formula.
Preparations were being made to consummate their understanding in a
treaty. Both Germany and Poland were satisfied the formula agreed upon
served both governments. Shortly before the agreement with Germany was to
be signed, Poland secretly signed a treaty with Great Britain dated
August 25, l939.
Great Britain agreed in that treaty to hasten the military assistance of
Poland "with all the support and assistance in its power" if Poland were
attacked by Germany. With that assurance from Great Britain, Poland broke
off negotiations with Germany. Germany did not understand the reason for
Poland's sudden change of mind and decided to proceed with the terms of
the arrangement agreed upon with Poland. That was the start of World War
II.
Great Britain knowingly deceived Poland when Great Britain actually
promised military assistance to Poland if Poland were attacked by
Germany. Great Britain could not come to Poland's assistance and Great
Britain knew it when Great Britain's offer of military assistance to
Poland was made.
Poland fell into Great Britain's trap and discontinued negotiations with
the Germans. Poland's unexplained discontinuance of negotiations with
Germany to complete the Danzig Corridor agreement resulted in Germany's
troops moving into the Danzig Corridor without an agreement with Poland.
Great Britain knew exactly what would take place in that event, that it
would mean the beginning or World War II. The rest is history. Talmudists
of the world welcomed a war against Germeny in l939 to somehow crush the
Nazi government as the Talmudists of the world crushed Germany in World
War I in 1917 by railroading the United States into the war in Europe as
Great Britain's ally.
President Roosevelt tried his hardest in 1939 to railroad The United
States into the war in Europe to accommodate Talmudists in the United
States. Germany learned by experience in World War I that the entry of
the United States into thc war in Europe in 1939 could prove equally
disastrous to Germany if the United States were raiiroaded into war in
Europe as Great Bntain's ally.
Germany exercised extraordinary caution not to provide the United States
with justification under internationai law to declare war against
Germany. That situation presented President Roosevelt with a problem.
President Roosevelt decided if it were impossible for him to get into the
war in Europe through the front door that he would railroad the United
States into the war in Europe through the back door.
Through the back door meant through Japan. Presidcnt Roosevelt finally
did railroad the United States into the war in Europe through the back
door, through Japan.
Secretary of Defense Stimson During World War II Makes Startling
Revelation
Germany and Japan had a treaty under which if either Germany or Japan
were attacked by a third powcr, the country which was not attacked by the
third power automaticaily is at war with that third power.
President Roosevelt planned to provoke Japan so Japan would attack the
United States. Japan in December 1941 attacked Pearl Harbor. The United
States immediately declared war against Japan and automatically was at
war with Germany.
The personal diary of the Hon. Mr. Henry L. Stimson and all his papers
are in Yale University Lihrary. Mr. Stimson each day entered in his
personal diary in his own handwriting the important events in his life
that day. Mr. Stimson was President Roosevelt's secretary of defense.
Mr. Stimson's diary was introduced as evidence in the United States
Senate investigation of the Pearl Harbor attack by Japan over the strong
objections of friends of President Roosevelt.
Mr. Stimson entered in his diary on November 25, 1941, two weeks before
Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, that at a meeting with President
Roosevelt and his cabinet that morning at the White House, President
Roosevelt told those present that he wished to be at war against Japan
but that he "did not want it to appear that the United States fired the
first shot."
Zionist Conspirators Provoke Pearl Harbor Incident
President Roosevelt knowingly provoked Japan to attack the United States.
President Roosevelt advised Japan they could purchase no more steel scrap
or oil from the United States.
Japan was in the midst of a war against China. Without scrap steel and
without oil Japan would be unable to continue that war. Japan was totally
dependent upon the United States for both steel scrap and oil. Professor
Charles Callan Tansill, professor of diplomatic history at Georgetown
University in Washington, wrote a classic work he called Back Door to
War, published by Henry Regnery of Chicago in 1952.
Professor Tansill spent five years after the war in the confidential
files of the State Department doing research there on World War II.
Professor Tansill's book has 652 pages all filled with alarming
authenticated facts little known to the public during the war.
In a scholarly detailed manner easily understood, Professor Tansill
supplies facts which are incontrovertible proof showing how President
Roosevelt railroaded the United States into World War II in Europe.
President Roosevelt's desire to please Talmudists among his friends,
influenced his better judgment. He overlooked that he was president of
all the people of the United States.
President Roosevelt realized if he expected political support by
Talmudists in the United States to continue he must find some way to
railroad the United States into the war then in progress in Europe
against Germany. Surely nobody can any longer question that railroading
the United States into World War II was President Roosevelts contribution
to the desperate predicament in which the United States today funds
itself in the Middle East.
President Harry S. Truman made his great contribution to the desperate
predicament in which the United States today funds itself in the Middle
East when he recognized as a sovereign state an armed uprising in
Palestine by 800,000 armed aliens transplanted into Palestine in a
conspiracy organized by Talmudists throughout the world.
President Truman in 1946 suffered from a pathological obsession that he
must be elected president of the United States in 1948 on his own
account.
Mr. Clarke M. Clifford, Secretary of War under President Lyndon B.
Johnson, deserves a great deal of credit for the recognition of the State
of Israel on May 14, 1948, by the United States. Mr. Eliahu Epstein, the
United States representative of the Jewish Agency in Washington in 1948,
told the story in his three- page article in the Jewish Chronicle of
London in its 10th anniversary issue of June 1958 celebrating the 10th
anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel.
Mr. Clifford undoubtedly was anxious to help because President Truman had
confided in his close friends that he wished to recognize the Zionist
state in the "first hour of its birth" as he did. The State of Israel was
officially "proclaimed" in Tel Aviv at midnight on May 14, l948.
President Truman recognized the birth of the State of Isreal eleven
minutes after midnight. President Truman finally advised this author that
he did not wish to carry on the discussion of the Zionist question with
him any further.
He wrote to this author that he had turned over the entire Palestine
question to "the Hon. David Niles."
Talmudists were willing to carry out their part of their bargain with
President Truman after he recognized the State of Israel.
Although the odds in President Truman's election in 1948 were 20 to 1
against his election, President Truman romped home the winner over
Governor Dewey assisted by the invisible and invincible Zionist political
steam-roller that always elects their candidates.
President Truman not only used the power and prestige of the United
States to compel the United Nations to admit the State of Israel as a
peace-loving nation, the regime of an armed uprising in Palestine by
transplanted aliens, but he made billions of United States taxpayers
dollars available to Talmudists to make the State of Israel powerful.
When the day to vote for the admission of the State of Iseral arrived
they were short two votes. The plan was about to collapse. In the
emergency, Mr Charles H. Silver engaged Cardinal Spellman to make two
trips to South America to change their votes in the United Nations
against the admission of the State of Israel into the United Nation to
vote in favor of the admission of the State of Israel into the United
Nations as a member.
The newspapers around the world on June 11, 1964, published Mr. Silver's
"confession" of a "secret I have kept for fifteen years." The "secret"
Cardinal Spellman kept with Mr. Silver was that Cardinal Spellman was
sent to South America by Mr. Silver on behalf of the Talmudists in New
York to "persuade" the South American countries to change their votes
against admitting the State of Israel to the United Nations to vote in
favor of admitting the State of Israel to the United Nations as a member.
This author was a close personal friend of Cardinal Spellman for twentyfive
years. Cardinal Spellman "confessed" to this author several years
ago that he felt he had committed an irreparable sin by conspiring with
the Talmudists in the United States to elect the State of Israel a member
of the United Nations.
In the midst of that bloody fighting in the Middle East in June 1967,
Cardinal Spellman told this author when alone with him in his study that
he felt personally responsible for all the lives lost in the 1967
invasion of the United Arab Republic and Syria by the State of Isreal.
H.J. 117 a Talmudic Creation-Eisenhower Steps in Line
The story of how President Dwight D. Eisenhower lied the United States
into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds
itself in the Middle East is not a complicated story.
Talmudists m the United States pressured President Eisenhower into
sponsoring Joint Resolution by Congress of H J Res. 117, on January 5,
1950, which was then refined by Congress to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs.
President Eisenhower knew less about what he was doing than a new born
babe. It was pitiful for this author to witness a great general being
figuratively pushed around by Talmudists unfit to shine his shoes.
President Eisenhower was always friendly towards this author. This author
met President Eisenhower when he was being considered by Mr. Thomas M.
Watson, Sr., as a presidential candidate on the Democratic ticket.
Mr. Watson was the founder of the International Business Machines
Company. He told this author at that time that he believed General
Eisenhower as a Civilian would make a great president.
As president of the United States, General Eisenhower was faithful to
these Talmudist supporters whose friendship he first cultivated in Europe
during his political activities in Germany after the end of World War 11.
Talmudists curried his favor after World War 11. They knew that as
president of the United States, General Eisenhower in their hands would
be like clay in the hands of the potter. In 1956 it appeared that Middle
East countries were undergoing changes in their governments.
The Zionist illegal occupation of Palestine still existed. Populations in
Middle East countries were growing restless. Talmudists recognized
something must be done to silence the unrest. President Eisenhower then
obliged the Talmudists. Lebanon is the heart of Middle East political
activity.
To nip action in the bud, by native populations aiming to assert their
independence from domination by Talmudists, Talmudists arranged with
President Eisenhower to occupy Lebanon with fourteen thousand (14,000)
troops and to station the Sixth Fleet off the coast To make it legal,
Talmudists had Congress pass a Joint resolution like the Tonkin Bay
Resolution passed by Congress to legalize the war in Vietnam.
President Eisenhower Performs Fulfillment of Zionist Demands in Middle
East
President Eisenhower occupied Lebanon with fourteen thousand (14,000)
United States troops and stationed the sixth Fleet off the Lebanon coast.
President Eisenhower was warning the Middle East nations not to attempt
to regain Palestine from the Zionists in illegal possession of Palestine.
President Eisenhower must have had a consortium of the smartest
Talmudists the state defense and justice departments prepare that joint
resolution.
The intent of that unclear language is to conceal the purpose of the
joint Resolution not to explain its purpose. The purpose was to have a
joint resolution in record that would permit President Eisenhower to use
the United States armed forces and navy to aid and abet the Zionist
thieves to hold onto their stolen loot without any necessity to ask
Congress to declare war.
Every word President Eisenhower uttered to defend the crooks in
occupation of Palestine was a lie which contributed to the desperate
predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle
East.
Talmudists in the United States were able to camouflage their illegal
aggression in the Middle East behind the glamour of President
Eisenhower's record as a great soldier. The story of how President John
F. Kennedy lied the United States into the desperate predicament in which
the United States today finds itself in the Middle East is very
distressing.
President Kennedy's future was uncertain after digressing on August 25,
l960, from the straight and narrow path he had followed all his life.
President Kennedy could not escape the consequences of his betrayal of
the high principles to which he aimed to dedicate his life.
President Kennedy surrendered to the lure of Talmudists who pledged to
put him in the White House as the president of the United States. On
August 23 1960, in the United States Senate office building in Washington
President Kennedy, at that time a senator, gave this author a copy of the
address he was to deliver in New York City on August 25, 1960.
In the copy of that address he stated among other things: "Israel...three
weeks ago I said in a public statement 'Israel is here to stay...my flat
prediction that Israel is here to stay...will endure and flourish...a
special obligation on the Democratic Party...it was President Truman who
first recognized the new State of Israel and gave it status in world
affairs...may I and...my hope and my pledge to continue the democratic
tradition...if the Democratic platform is to have any meaning...the White
House must take the lead...American intervention.. will not now be
easy...I propose that we make it crystal clear...we will act promptly and
decisively...I propose that we make it clear...our guarantee that we will
act with whatever force and speed are necessary..the risk of war..."
President (Senator) Kennedy was giving Talmudists his pledge that as the
president of the United States he would send sons, husbands and brothers
of the grass roots population of the United States to fight in Palestine
under the flag of the United States in a war in Palestine to help crooks
hold onto stolen loot, to aid and abet thieves retain possession of their
stolen plunder.
This author met President Kennedy for the first time in his father's
office at 230 Park Avenue, in New York City, on the day after he was
elected for the first time as a Congressman in November l946.
This author was in a conference with Ambassador Joseph Kennedy and Judge
Landis, an associate of Ambassador Kennedy. In his private office they
were consulting this author on the Middle East situation which had
recently taken an ugly turn in the United Nations.
President John Kennedy Pledges Zionists He Will Act in Their Favor Even
at the Risk of War
Ambassador Kennedy discussed the subject matter for a short while with
those present. The Congressman then asked to leave as he was catching a
train for Washington.
This author invited the Congressman to lunch and he accepted. After lunch
Congress Kennedy asked if this author had nothing else to do than ride to
Washington with him on the train.
This author was willing and rode to Washington with him. From that day in
November l946 to August 23, l960, this author saw the Congressman, and
the Senator, countless times in his office in Washington and New York
City
This author was happy to enlighten Senator Kennedy on the Palestine
question. Without a doubt there were soon few people in the world who
were better informed on this subject than Senator Kennedy.
In the fourteen years this author had the honor of enjoying the
confidence of President Kennedy he never failed to express his
appreciation for this author's interest in his career.
President Kennedy also appreciated the friendship this author
demonstrated for his father, Ambassador Kennedy. Ambassador Kennedy was
blackmailed by President Roosevelt. President Roosevelt told Ambassador
Kennedy not to write the book he planned to write.
President Roosevelt removed Ambassador Kennedy as Ambassador to the Court
of St. James in London for circulating what Neville Chamberlain told
Ambassador Kennedy in London in l938.
The Senior Kennedy Liquidated Politically by Franklin Roosevelt for
Reporting Talmudic Conspiracy
Ambassador Kennedy reported to Washington in 1938 that Neville
Chamberlain told him that the United States and Talmudists throughout the
world forced Great Britain into the Second World War.
Chamberlain also told Ambassador Kennedy in 1938 that Great Britain had
nothing with which to fight Germany, that Great Britain should not risk
going to war against Germany.
Chamberlain complained to Ambassador Kennedy that United States
Ambassador to France William C. Bullit in 1938 was urging President
Roosevelt that Germany must be "faced down" in their attitude towards
Poland in the Danzig Corridor matter.
President Roosevelt recalled Ambassador Kennedy to silence him.
Ambassador Kennedy planned to return to the United States to write a book
telling what he knew that he thought the grass roots population of the
United States should be told. President Roosevelt sent for Ambassador
Kennedy upon his return to the United States to come to Washington to see
him.
President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy that he had heard that he was
planning to write a book which he asked him not to do. After Ambassador
Kennedy's unpleasant meeting with President Roosevelt in Washington after
his recall from London for daring to circulate what Chamberlain had told
him about Talmudists, his ambition in life was to see one of his sons in
the White House as president of the United States.
The story of how President Lyndon Baines Johnson lied the United States
into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds
itself in the Middle East is not a long story.
It commences with a telephone call to this author in New York from
Congressman Ed Gosset in Washington to come there at once. Congressman
Gosset represented Amarillo, Texas, in the House of Representatives.
Congressman Gosset was alarmed that the Senate Armed Services Committee
the day before confirmed the appointment of Anna M. Rosenberg as
Assistant Secretary of Defense without a public hearing. The only witness
who appeared to testify concerning Anna Rosenberg's fitness to serve as
Assistant Secretary of Defense was Ann Rosenberg herself.
That by itself aroused suspicion among the country's leaders. Congress
Gosset took this author to Senator Johnson's office and explained to him
the reason for the visit. Senator Johnson was a member of the Senate
Armed Services Committee which had confirmed Anna Rosenberg's appointment
the previous day.
Senator Johnson was very much interested in learning about Anna
Rosenberg's associations with communists. Senator Johnson asked this
author if he would assist him in looking into the matter further by
producing a communist who knew Anna Rosenberg. Upon this author's return
to New York that day, he mentioned Senator Johnson's request to his
attorney, Mr. Hallam Richardson.
Within a few hours, Mr. Richardson produced Mr. Ralph de Sola, a
prominent communist, the head of film photography of documents by
communist Organizations in the United States. After Anna Rosenberg's
confirmation by the Senate Armed Services Committee was withdrawn,
another hearing was held to confirm her second appointment.
Anna Rosenberg testified she was born m Hungary and came to the United
States in 1912 at the age of eleven years. The second hearing brought out
some interesting facts--it confirmed her extended appointment for four
years. In this author's meetings with Senator Johnson, this author had
occasion to discuss the Palestine question with him.
Senator Johnson was very interested in the Palestine question. That
subject was of great interest to the Senate Armed Services Committee. The
occupation of Palestine by the Zionists concerned the Armed Services
Committee.
Lyndon Johnson Master-Minded Six Day War
Senator Johnson was vice-president before the death of President Kennedy
elevated him. He then became president of the United States. As president
of the United States, Johnson was aware of the possibility of armed
conflict in the Middle East in which the United States might become
involved.
President Johnson understood the power Talmudists exerted in the United
States and in the United Nations. One of his closest friends in
Washington was Mr. Abe Fortas, a prominent Zionist, whom President
Johnson appointed to the Supreme Court.
President Johnson knew he was violating the letter and spirit of his oath
of office as the president of all the people of the United States when he
filled the pipe lines of the State of Israel with munitions of war paid
for with the money of Christian taxpayers in the United States.
President Johnson cannot plead ignorance of the facts. Though a very
close mutual friend, this author kept President Johnson constantly
informed on developments in the Middle East.
President Johnson will be the first to admit he lied the United States
into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds
itself in the Middle East if he will glance at the promises, pledges and
predictions he made to Talmudists in the United States while he occupied
the White House as president of the United States.
President Johnson now seeks to justify his generosity with United States
taxpayers' money by referring to a "commitment." President Johnson knows
that he is in error. The only commitment the taxpayers in the United
States recognize is President Johnson's commitment to serve the best
interests of the grass roots population of the United States.
According to the Pentagon Papers he was not very successful in that
respect. President Johnson does not display mature judgment when he
squanders billions of the taxpayers' hard-earned dollars to aid and abet
crooks to hold onto their stolen loot, their stolen plunder.
President Johnson would feel differently if the Soviet Union financed an
invasion of Texas by Mexicans who expelled Texans from their homes with
only shirts on their backs to survive in refugee camps in the deserts of
Arizona and New Mexico on six cents a day for food provided by the United
Nations.
Mexicans have a more legitimate claim to the territory called Texas today
than the eastern European Talmudists ever had to Palestine.
What would President Johnson's attitude have been if the Soviet Union
contributed thirty-two billion dollars ($32,000,000,000.00) to go towards
entrenching these Mexican invaders in Texas, and then supplying the
Mexican invaders with sophisticated military hardware to threaten the
other forty-nine United States if they interfered with the illegal
possession of Texas by the Mexican invaders in illegal occupation of
Texas, without having paid one cent to the lawful landowners for a square
foot of Texas.
The story how President Nixon lied the United States into the desperate
predicament in which the United States today finds itself is of great
interest to the grass roots population of the United States every time
President Nixon grants the Zionists, in illegal occupation of Palestine,
another five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000.00) of United States
tnxpayers' money.
Is President Nixon serving two masters? President Nixon is as guilty as
the other six masters of deception who lied the United States into the
desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself in
the Middle East. President Nixon is both an eminent lawyer and President
of the United States.
President Nixon cannot produce any evidence of a legitimate "commitment"
to anyone to support President Nixon's generous use of United States
taxpayers' money for financing the permanent possession by thieves of
their stolen loot. Does President Nixon mean the "commitment" by
political leaders to the Talmudists in the United States who control the
media for mass information?
President Nixon belittles himself as well as the United States
Administration for whom he speaks when he talks about a "commitment" of
the United States to underwrite the perpetual possession of the illegal
and immoral theft of Palestine by Talmudists.
President Nixon's generosity has reached epidemic proportions. Each of
the additional five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000.00) of United
States taxpayers' money he donates to the so-called State of Israel is
that many more nails in the coffin of the United States.
These seven masters of deception mock the elementary and equitable
principles upon which the United States was founded when they throw hardearned
United States taxpayers' dollars by the billions to criminals in
possession of their stolen loot as if it were stage money. Have they no
shame or conscience?
When there were civil wars recently in the Congo, in Nagana, in Pakistan
and other countries in this century, did the United States "recognize"
the populations as independent indigenous populations who planned to
secede and form their sovereign independent states?
Then why recognize transplanted alien invaders financed by Talmudists? If
these seven masters of deception reflected the honorable attitude the
United States should exhibit, they would not traffic with thieves,
murderers, and scoundrels as they are doing with the hooligans from the
State of lsrael.
The United States refused to "recognize" the independence of Katanga, of
Biafra, of East Pakistan, of Quebec and of total Ireland, but they rushed
to "recognize" the hooligans of an armed Palestine uprising by
transplanted aliens as a legitimate sovereign state. What next?
Talmudic Hidden Hand Controls the U.S. Vote in the United Nations
The one hundred and twenty-five other members of the United Nations know
that the United States was as crooked as a cork screw to recognize the
so-called State of Israel as a lawful representative government of the
indigenous population.
The other nations of the world all know by this time that Talmudists
elect the presidents of the United States and members of Congress. If
these Talmudists in the United States were paupers, they could not elect
a dog catcher in the United States. How rotten can the political system
in the United States get before it drops into the lap of a more honorable
nation like a rotten piece of fruit falls from a tree?
Rothschild Conspiracy Fulfilled
The so-called State of Israel is positive that the United States must at
the request of the State of Israel veto any resolution introduced in the
Security Council to expel the so-called State of Israel.
Consequently, this so-called State of Israel feels as smug as a bug in a
rug regardless of what they do. The Talmudists control the delegation in
the United States. Nobody but a fool or an ignoramus doubts that today.
The Talmudists always instruct the delegates of the United States how to
vote in the Security Council. If a resolution is ever introduced to expel
the so-called State of Israel, the United States must veto the
resolution.
The grass roots population of the United States deserves to know the
truth about the Middle East crisis. They will pay with their lives unless
they soon acquire a better understanding about why the Middle East crisis
exists. The United States finds it convenient to blame everything that
goes wrong anywhere in the world on Communism.
Communism provides a convenient whipping boy for politicians. The arch
villains behind the world's difficulties are the Rothschilds. For the
moment, this author will only deal with the Rothschilds interest in the
subject matter of this article, the Middle East desperate predicament of
the world.
This author can speak with confidence on this subject as his knowledge
was obtained first hand from members of the Rothschild dynasty in London,
New York and elsewhere. The extent of the Rothschild wealth cannot be
estimated with any degree of certainty.
A conservative guess of the total value of the Rothschild fortunes would
be billions of dollars, if that amount can be imagined. The important
thing is the major portion of this wealth is in the Far East. The
Rothschild interest in Europe, and the Western Hemisphere, are
tremendous.
However, in comparison to their wealth in the Far East, it is
significant. A most vital single thing in the world to the Rothschild
dynasty is access to the Far East. Access to the Far East through the
Mediterranean is know as Great Britain's lifeline.
The Rothschild dynasty had plunged Great Britain into many wars only to
preserve their lifeline to the Far East. History tells that story. The
Suez Canal was not constructed by the Rothschilds. They did their utmost
to prevent its construction.
The Suez Canal was constructed by the Frenchman, de Lesseps, and the
Khedive of Egypt. The Rothschilds refused to invest one cent of their
money in the company which obtained the concession to construct the Suez
Canal. The Suez Canal was completed in 1869.
It, from the very start, proved a great success. The Rothschilds swindled
a forty percent (40%) interest in the Suez Canal Company from the Khedive
of Egypt. They found a forty percent (40%) interest insufficient for
their purpose as the value of the Suez Canal had been demonstrated after
it was in use two years.
The Rothschilds decided they must control their lifeline to their fortune
in the Far East. Without justification or provocation of any description,
the Rothschilds had Great Britain occupy Egypt exactly as a defeated
power is occupied by the victor. The British ran the schools, the banks,
the railroads, the courts, and Egypt ceased to be Egypt except in name.
Naturally, the Suez Canal came under complete control of Great Britain.
The original concession for the Suez Canal was for ninety-nine years. The
more important the Suez Canal became to the Rothschilds, the more the
Rothschilds worried what was going to happen when the ninety-nine year
concession for the Suez Canal expired in 1969 and reverted to Egypt as
the concession provided.
Great Britain spent large fortunes and spilled much blood in many wars to
maintain uninterrupted and undisturbed possession of the Suez Canal. The
Rothschilds knew that Egypt would be free to grant a new concession for
the Suez Canal to a power unfriendly to Great Britain, like France,
Germany or Russia, when the concession expired.
The Rothschilds feared the consequences should the Suez Canal fall into
the hands of an unfriendly power and Great Britain had many powers in
mind who could make good use of the Suez Canal politically also against
the British Empire.
Rothschild Fortune Risked Collapse Without Middle East Controls Under
Zionist Supervision
The Rothschild dynasty's fortune and Great Britain's authority would
diminish in the Far East if Great Britain no longer controlled the Suez
Canal. Looking ahead, the Rothschilds planned their future without the
Suez Canal.
The First World War ended in l9l8 and the Rothschilds had their plan
ready. Their plan was very simple. Under the October 1916 London
Agreement, Great Britain planned to turn over Palestine to the Zionists
after the war.
The eastern European Talmudists had no money. Without money Palestine was
a headache to the Zionists. The Rothschilds in London promised the
Zionists unlimited financial assistance with which to develop Palestine,
but on one condition--that as soon as Palestine was turned over to the
Zionists, they apply for admission to the British Empire as a member.
The Rothschilds planned to construct a canal in Palestine from Ashkelon
on the Mediterranean to Aqaba on the Gulf of Aqaba. They planned to
construct a modern steel and concrete canal with two lanes for ships.
The canal would be on British territory in perpetuity enjoying the
advantages of defense by Great Britain if needed and international
recognition as a member of the British Empire. Great Britain occupied
Palestine from 1921 to 1948 as the Mandatory of the League of Nations.
During that period the British Empire fell apart. By the time the
Zionists established a Zionist state in Palestine, the British Empire had
fallen apart and no longer existed. Palestine under the Zionists could
not apply for admission to the British Empire. There was no British
Empire.
When the Rothschilds realized what was happening, they were compelled to
alter their plans. The Rothschilds were determined that Great Britain
must turn over Palestine to the Zionists for a sovereign Zionist state.
The idea of a United Nations was then a reality and the Rothschilds
planned upon getting the sovereign Zionist state admitted to the United
Nations. The United Nations would provide Palestine with the same
advantages that the British Empire would have provided once upon a time.
If the sovereign Zionist state could be admitted to the United Nations,
Palestine's future was assured. Rothschilds did not know what to do. Then
in October 1916, the World Zionist Organization entered the picture.
When Great Britain was considering surrender to Germany, the World
Zionist Organization and the British War Cabinet entered into the October
1916 London Agreement. The Rothschild dynasty was astonished when, on
April 6, 1917, the United States declared war against Germany.
By July 1917 it appeared that Germany would be defeated after the entry
of the United States into the war. The Rothschild dynasty sought out Mr.
Chaim Weizmann and cultivated his friendship. The Rothschilds realized
that the World Zionist Organization must be recognized.
The Rothschilds purchased a Prince Albert frock coat and a silk hat for
Chaim Weizmann and treated him as though he was already the head of the
government of Palestine, which he eventually became.
The Rothschilds renewed their interest in the plan to finance the Zionist
movement in Palestine in exchange for the concession to construct their
modem canal across Palestine in competition with the Suez Canal.
Great Britain was certain to defeat Germany. Great Britain had agreed to
turn over Palestine to the Talmudists of the world for railroading the
United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
The only link missing now was the existence in Palestine of an
independent sovereign Zionist state.
The Rothschilds financed transplanting 600,000 eastern European
Talmudists into Palestine and arranged to remove the last of General
Allenby's 200,000 British troops from Palestine.
In collaboration with President Truman in the United States the armed
600,000 transplanted alien Talmudists on May 18, 1948, began their
expulsion from Palestine of the Christian and Moslem disarmed and
defenseless 1,350,000 population and at the same time declared their
armed uprising the State of Israel. The Rothschilds were now satisfied.
The only unfinished business was to force the Middle East nations to
recognize the State of Israel. The Rothschilds commenced their final
stage by building the present oil pipeline from Ashkelon on the
Mediterranean to Aqaba, along the route of their future modern longplanned
steel and concrete two-lane canal.
The Middle East situation is the result of the Rothschild efforts to
secure permanent and secure access to the Far East. This nonsense about
the "repatriation" of "Gods chosen people" to "their promised land" has
been revealed the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind.
The single purpose of the Rothschilds was to secure permanent and secure
access to their vast natural resources in the Far East. This author has
had the patience and the time to inform seven presidents of the United
States about the underlying reason for the Middle East aggression by the
Talmudist throughout the world.
These seven masters of deception were all briefed by this author on the
reason for the aggression in Palestine.
This author spent a small fortune acquainting members of Congress and
political and industrial leaders in the United States with all these
facts, supplying them with photostat reproductions of documentary
evidence to support every statement made by this author.
It cries out to heaven that this country and the world has been put to
the expense of billions of billions of dollars to see the Rothschilds
have secure and permanent access to their unlimited wealth in the Far
East.
If the Talmudists of the world say they are willing to see another world
war fought to establish "God's chosen people" in "their promised land" to
rule the world from Palestine, then it is time to tell the grass roots of
the United States population what all the excitement is about.
This issue must be dragged into the light for the grass roots of the
population of the United States to see why they are expected to die in an
unnecessary war with a smile on their face.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

2008-08-09T17:17:00.000-07:00

A Jewish Defector Warns America
By Benjamin H. Freedman

Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing
and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890,
was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one
time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with
organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the
remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable
fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which
has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking
about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish
organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr.
Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel
Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and
John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This
speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel
in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of
that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging
and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential
message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever
before. -- K.A.S.

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete
control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go
into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States
as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that
is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all
asleep.
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few
people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by
Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-
Hungary, and Turkey.
Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it
actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept
all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.
Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food
supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied.
They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on
the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and
going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And
the Italian army had collapsed.
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the
border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They
offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante
basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let room. There was absolutely no
reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar,
we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could
obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never
been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well,
we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that
shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win
the war.” They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten
years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter,
which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't
know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists
what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into
the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as
phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United
States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the
Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews
there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was
there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference,
when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations
who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, “How about
Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the
Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh,
so that was the game!
That's why the United States came into the war.” The Germans for the first time
realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were
slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to
get it at any cost.
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this,
they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in
any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau
there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is
Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big
steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You
had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the
Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the
world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The
Germans felt: “Well, that was quite a sellout.”
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the
United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told
the Soviet Union: “Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole
thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet
Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing
defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this
country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens
working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through
them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel,
then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would
dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts
to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to
them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the
Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave
them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany
down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine
as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read
about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923
wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that
the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that
this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United
States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the
Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-
Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political.
It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether
a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema' Yisroel” or “Our
Father.” Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.
Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the
Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which
Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful.
They built up a big navy.
They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the
French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and
so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time,
between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one
state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their
navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they
could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a
result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down
Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why
those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they
naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a
single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the
secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State
Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent
to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who
wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent
shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a
lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent
of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and
ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international
affiliations.
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for
a few days.
Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the
government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to
Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as
they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he
fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was
quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status,
and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair
on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the
Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one
another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany.
And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were
only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany
were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the
economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was
devalued and bought up practically everything.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really
understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say,
discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same
way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone
in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from
every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to
Germany: “You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position,
whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that
way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you.” You can
imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in
Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the
head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came
to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia
Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in
which he in effect said, “The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against
Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we
are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott
against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their
export business.” And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to
be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they
exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population
would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of
the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed
in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated
that “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has
advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration,” which some of you
may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules
laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a
boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in
any store anywhere in the world with the words “made in Germany” on it. In fact,
an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of
dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted
if anyone came in and found a dish marked “made in Germany,” they were
picketed with signs saying “Hitler,” “murderer,” and so forth, something like these
sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy
chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews,
a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked “made in
Germany.” Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20
years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long
time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with
hundreds of people walking around with signs saying “murderers,” “Hitlerites,” and
so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt
in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no
murder, there was nothing.
Naturally, the Germans said, “Who are these people to declare a boycott against us
and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill?
Who are they to do that to us?” They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted
swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his
money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve
Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate
who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew
from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official,
that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you
found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now I don't like to use the word “anti-Semitism” because it's meaningless, but it
means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was
any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War
I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World
War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the
Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between.
And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they
started to re-arm.
In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet
Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that “Our turn was
going to come soon, unless we are strong.” The same as we in this country are
saying today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.” Our
government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense.
Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took
over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other
countries of the world.
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we
cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that
nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to
describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10
megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the
nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and
God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear
war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as
the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3
is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their coreligionists
everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United
States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world
government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it,
but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.
What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be
on their way to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than you
knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet
to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in
the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew
it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to
Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected,
and there was talk around the office there. I was “confidential man” to Henry
Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison
between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with
President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them
drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become
the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist
movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two
fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it
came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.
That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys
over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their
“commonwealth.” They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're
coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness who you
find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” I don't know what
state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a
jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are
known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews,
because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent
of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally
Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they
were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe.
They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia
did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the
biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other
monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the
details of that now.
But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and
barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the
degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -
- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really
Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he
picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to
the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis,
and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.
There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy
Land.
Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of
them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed
insurrections in Palestine by saying, “You want to help repatriate God's Chosen
People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian
duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.
You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're
Jews.” But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish
were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them “people of the Holy Land,” as it
would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems “Arabs.” Mohammed only died in
620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious
belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and
Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call
themselves “Arabs.” You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that
those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a
religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish.
When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and
imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants.
They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid
race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the
Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the
king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of
Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews.
Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say,
“We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to
their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.” Could there be a bigger lie than
that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in
the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not
too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it
often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black
white. And nobody could blame you.
That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that
has befallen the world.
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to
them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the
very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You
repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter
into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may
make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be
an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall
have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take
an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you
recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How
much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much
as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same
reason.